Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock A locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
On this page: * Pollutants of Concern for Aquaculture * NPDES Permits for Aquaculture * Aquaculture Water Quality Management
Aquaculture Topics * Overview * NPDES Permitting * Managing Aquaculture to Protect Water Quality * Federal Collaborations
Pollutants of concern often associated with aquaculture include: * Total suspended solids, settleable solids * Biological wastes (metabolic waste, unconsumed feed) * Floating and submerged matter * Five-day biochemical oxygen demand, low dissolved oxygen * Nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen), ammonia * Drugs that are unconsumed or unmetabolized * Chemicals, such as anti-fouling agents
NPDES permits establish regulatory frameworks to set pollution controls and demonstrate that those controls are working. This 10-minute video describes how NPDES permits applies to discharges from aquaculture operations.
NPDES permits for aquaculture facilities include effluent limitations that control the discharge of pollutants. Effluent limitations may be numeric or narrative. Numeric limits specify the maximum amount of a pollutant that may be discharges over a certain period, usually a day or a month. Narrative limits include Best Management Practices (BMPs) or requirements to minimize or eliminate discharges. NPDES permits for concentrated aquatic animal production (CAAP) facilities that produce 100,000 pounds or more of aquatic animals must include requirements to implement the effluent guidelines established at 40 CFR Part 451Exit EPA’s website. These facilities are subject to reporting requirements regarding: * The use of certain drugs; * Unanticipated discharges; and * Developing and maintaining a BMP plan.
CAAP facilities using flow-through and recirculating systems and net pens are subject to additional requirements dictated by the effluent guidelines. NPDES permits for these facilities include requirements for: * Solids control (flow-through and recirculating systems only); * Feed management, waste collection and disposal, transport or harvest discharge, and carcass removal (net pens only); * Materials storage; * Maintenance; * Recordkeeping; and * Training.
NPDES permits for non-CAAP aquaculture facilities may contain similar requirements. Sometimes, NPDES permits for both CAAP and non-CAAP aquaculture facilities may require other water quality management activities, such as monitoring for drug and chemical application, or escape prevention and response plans. Explore the interactive graphics below to learn more about common types of BMPs that may be included in NPDES permits for flow-through and net pen aquaculture facilities. Select each activity for a description of how it protects water quality. The activities shown are examples only and may not be required or appropriate at every aquaculture facility. Refer to the applicable NPDES permit to determine which activities are required for a specific facility.
The graphic is not supported on your device.
Reporting the use of certain drugs and the occurrence of unanticipated discharges makes permitting authorities aware of such discharges.
Best Management Plans (BMPs) ensure that producers have procedures in place to control discharges of pollutants from the facility. Annual updates ensure the plans account for facility changes and new or innovative BMPs.
Efficient feed management helps control discharges of solids and nutrients.
Routine cleaning of rearing units and settling basins minimizes discharge of accumulated solids.
Removal and disposal of animal mortalities and wastes keeps them out of the receiving water.
Proper storage of feed, drugs, chemicals, and pesticides reduces chances of leaks and spills.
Prompt cleanup of leaks and spills prevents pollutants from entering the receiving water.
Routine inspections by facility staff help identify damage and necessary repairs.
Regular maintenance keeps facilities functioning properly to maintain efficiency and prevent unintended discharges.
Maintaining records on feeding, number and weight of aquatic animals, cleaning, inspections, maintenance, and repairs provides documentation that the operator has implemented required management activities.
Training staff on proper spill prevention, operation, and cleaning procedures prepares them to prevent and respond to accidental discharges and spills, operate the system efficiently, and reduce discharges of solids and nutrients.
Source water monitoring provides information on levels of pollutants in the intake water. Some permits require source water monitoring, particularly where intake credits or net limits are allowed.
Effluent monitoring helps assess pollutant levels and verify compliance with NPDES permit conditions.
Proper application of drugs and chemicals prevents them from entering the receiving water.
Properly siting production system and discharge points prevents adverse environmental impacts (e.g., to endangered or threatened species and their critical habitat and historical sites) and other use conflicts (e.g., water use, navigation, or other local or state requirements). View a text version of the graphic, Best Management Practices for Flow-Through Aquaculture.
The graphic is not supported on your device.
Reporting the use of certain drugs and the occurrence of unanticipated discharges makes permitting authorities aware of such discharges.
Best Management Plans (BMPs) ensure that producers have procedures in place to control discharges of pollutants from the facility. Annual updates ensure the plans account for facility changes and new or innovative BMPs.
Efficient feed management, including real-time feed monitoring, helps control discharges of solids and nutrients.
Collection and proper disposal of feed bags, packaging, rope, and netting prevents their release to the surrounding environment.
Proper disposal of transport water and harvest wastes (e.g., blood, viscera, carcasses) minimizes waste materials discharged overboard.
Regular and frequent removal of animal mortalities prevents their discharge to the surrounding water.
Proper storage of drugs, pesticides, feed, and petroleum products reduces the chance of leaks and spills.
Prompt cleanup of spills prevents pollutants from entering the receiving water.
Routine inspections help identify damage and necessary repairs to prevent release of non-native species.
Regular maintenance keeps facilities functioning properly to maintain efficiency and prevent unintended discharges.
Maintaining records on feeding, number and weight of aquatic animals, net pen changes, inspections, and repairs provides documentation that the operator has implemented required management activities.
Training staff on proper spill prevention, operation, and cleaning procedures prepares them to prevent and respond to accidental discharges and spills, operate the system efficiently, and reduce discharges of solids and nutrients.
Proper net hygiene practices prevent discharges of biofouling organisms, solids, and anti-fouling chemicals.
Properly siting net pens prevents adverse environmental impacts (e.g., to endangered or threatened species and their critical habitat and to historical sites) and other use conflicts (e.g., water use, navigation, or other local or state requirements).
Escape prevention and response plans ensure that producers have procedures in place to prevent fish escape and can take action in the event fish escape occurs. View a text version of the graphic, Best Management Practices for Net Pen Aquaculture.
Open Sidenav Menu Close Sidenav Menu Contact Us About NPDES Contact Us About NPDES to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem. Last updated on March 1, 2026 Welcome! Please share your feedback on how we can make www.epa.gov work better for you. A red asterisk (*) indicates a required field.
Thank you. Your feedback has been received.
alert message Required Questions - page 1 of 2 question_55203_answer_01 How would you rate your experience on www.epa.gov today? *
0 Stars 1 Star 2 Stars 3 Stars 4 Stars 5 Stars Please explain the reason for your rating. * 400 characters allowed Would you like to take two more minutes to answer more questions to help us improve our services? Yes, keep going → No, only submit these responses Optional questions - page 2 of 2 How would you describe yourself? Business Government employee Scientist Student Other Enter other text Please tell us why you visited www.epa.gov today. 400 characters allowed Did you visit www.epa.gov to accomplish a specific task? If yes, please explain why you were able or unable to accomplish your task. 400 characters allowed How can we make www.epa.gov a more helpful website? 400 characters allowed Submit []: required